blueflower.org classic
Monday, January 20, 2003

The Golden Globes 'n' Stuff ::

Everyone either watched the Golden Globes last night or can read about the winners in a newspaper or online, so I'm not going to bother rehashing all the winners again. Instead, I just want to make a few observational comments....

1) Next year the HFPA needs to invest in a shepherd's crook. Drag those bastards off stage who don't know how to make short acceptance speeches.

2) Did that jackass who produced Chicago really need to stand up there wasting everyone's time doing an extended version of thanking all of the same people who had just been thanked moments earlier by both Richard Gere and Renee Zellweger? Thank you orchestra and producers for eventually just cutting him off.

3) Are Richard Gere and Julia Roberts that inseparable that he needed to make an acceptance speech that was basically the male equivalent of the speech and performance given by Julia when she won her Oscar?

4) Pedro Almodovar - you won the fucking award for best foreign language film in a category where any real competition was stifled so you could win since you're not going to win the Oscar. Get over it. Walk up, accept your award, say thank you, and sit your Spanish ass back down.

5) Jack Nicholson - right on as usual: Nicole Kidman obviously looks better with her own nose and I thought About Schmidt was a comedy also.

6) The producer of The Hours could have handled his speech much better also. I have no problem with the three female stars all coming up on stage, but couldn't he have planned for that and had them all come up together when he went up to accept the award? More wasting of my time.

7) Is John C. Reilly this year's Jim Broadbent? He's even in a musical with Nicole Kidman. Do I smell an Oscar nom for Best Supporting Actor for one of his roles on the horizon?

8) Were U2 and "Curb Your Enthusiasm" both completely surpise winners? Unlike everyone else who had very easy paths to the stage, Bono and The Edge and Larry David and his crew all had to pass through obstacle courses and find their way through the Labyrinth to get to stage.

9) Although I missed the first half hour because I was coming home from work, I have the feeling that Larry David still had the best acceptance speech of the night.

10) What was the deal with Dick Clark? Those recaps were just stupid and ill-prepared.

11) What the hell was Sharon Stone wearing? Did she lose a bet?

That is all. The countdown now starts to the Oscars.

posted at 08:53 AM | comments: (2)
comments

Sharon Stone was wearing a "remember me?" outfit. I'm sure she's been out of the spotlight long enough to be trying a "comeback". Whatever. I was more annoyed by her shouting every third word while she was up there. What gives? I think her brain hemorrhage or stroke or whatever it was has seriously impaired her ability to speak.
I missed Larry David's speech (I had to keep going back to the Raiders-Titans game); what did he say?
Also, I don't think Jack Nicholson was kidding about being on Valium....

posted by Annemarie | January 20, 2003 @ 07:57 PM

Seeing as it's been a few days, I don't totally remember Larry David's speech, but it was something along the lines of taking every opportunity to annoy people possible.

posted by Krist | January 22, 2003 @ 10:19 AM

» design history

planet starraver
planet starraver (12/99-6/00)


sputnik 6!
sputnik 6! (1/00-4/00)


blueflower.org v1.0
blueflower.org v1.0 (6/00-6/01)


blueflower.org v2.0
blueflower.org v2.0 (6/01-11/01)


blueflower.org v3.0
blueflower.org v3.0 (11/01-6/02)


blueflower.org v4.0
blueflower.org v4.0 (6/02-7/02)


blueflower.org v5.0
blueflower.org v5.0 (7/02-1/03)


blueflower.org v6.0
blueflower.org v6.0 (1/03-3/03)


blueflower.org v7.0
blueflower.org v7.0 (3/03-6/03)


blueflower.org v8.0
blueflower.org v8.0 (6/03-7/04)


blueflower.org v9.0
blueflower.org v9.0 (10/04-12/04)


blueflower.org v10.0
blueflower.org v10.0 (12/04-7/05)
 
©1998-2005 starraver industries | all rights reserved | xhtml & css | williamsburg, brooklyn, ny 11211 usa